Seattle U.
Men -
Women
2011
-
2012 -
2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
117 |
Erik Barkhaus |
SR |
31:56 |
583 |
Matthew McClement |
SR |
33:05 |
927 |
Collin Overbay |
SO |
33:39 |
996 |
Ryan Dennison |
SR |
33:46 |
1,190 |
Graham Kinzel-Grubbs |
JR |
34:03 |
1,398 |
Jeff Baklund |
JR |
34:20 |
1,672 |
Baxter Arguinchona |
SO |
34:43 |
1,952 |
Peter VanNuland |
JR |
35:11 |
|
National Rank |
#90 of 311 |
West Region Rank |
#15 of 32 |
Chance of Advancing to Nationals |
0.0% |
Most Likely Finish |
16th at Regional |
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
0.0% |
Top 10 in Regional |
0.0% |
Top 20 in Regional |
97.9% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Erik Barkhaus |
Matthew McClement |
Collin Overbay |
Ryan Dennison |
Graham Kinzel-Grubbs |
Jeff Baklund |
Baxter Arguinchona |
Peter VanNuland |
Oregon Dellinger Invitational |
09/29 |
1027 |
31:56 |
33:18 |
33:20 |
33:34 |
34:20 |
34:26 |
35:34 |
|
WAC Championships |
10/27 |
1048 |
32:10 |
33:08 |
33:39 |
33:44 |
33:58 |
34:21 |
34:26 |
35:12 |
West Region Championships |
11/09 |
1009 |
31:53 |
32:48 |
34:09 |
34:08 |
33:54 |
34:15 |
34:31 |
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Championship |
100% |
16.4 |
471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.6 |
3.2 |
8.4 |
18.5 |
27.3 |
19.2 |
11.7 |
5.8 |
3.0 |
1.3 |
0.6 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Erik Barkhaus |
37.0% |
93.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Erik Barkhaus |
16.6 |
|
|
0.1 |
0.7 |
1.3 |
2.7 |
3.2 |
4.2 |
5.1 |
4.8 |
5.2 |
4.4 |
4.2 |
4.4 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
3.1 |
3.3 |
2.6 |
3.0 |
2.3 |
2.2 |
2.0 |
1.9 |
1.9 |
Matthew McClement |
80.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collin Overbay |
113.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ryan Dennison |
118.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Graham Kinzel-Grubbs |
131.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeff Baklund |
144.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baxter Arguinchona |
158.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
7 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
8 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
9 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
10 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
11 |
0.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
0.6% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
3.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
8.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
18.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
27.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
16 |
17 |
19.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
17 |
18 |
11.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
18 |
19 |
5.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
19 |
20 |
3.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
20 |
21 |
1.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
21 |
22 |
0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
22 |
23 |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
23 |
24 |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
0.0 |